--- title: "ICANN's Next Round of New gTLDs (2026) | Pitch" description: "Where ICANN's 2026 round of new generic top-level domains stands in October 2026, how the process continues after the application window, and what it means for…" url: https://www.pitch.law/academy/icanns-next-round-of-new-generic-top-level-domains-in-2026 --- [pitch](https://www.pitch.law/) [Academy](https://www.pitch.law/academy) [New gTLDs](https://www.pitch.law/academy/topics/gtld) # ICANN's Next Round of New gTLDs (2026) Where ICANN's 2026 round of new generic top-level domains stands in October 2026, how the process continues after the application window, and what it means for brand owners. - By By Bart Lieben, Attorney-at-Law - Published 21 August 2025 ## The legal framework A generic top-level domain (gTLD) is the part of an address to the right of the last dot. New gTLDs are not created by a statute. ICANN, the non-profit that coordinates the domain name system, runs a programme in which organisations apply, are evaluated and, if successful, sign a registry agreement with ICANN. The rules sit in three layers: the policy recommendations developed in ICANN's community, the Applicant Guidebook that turns them into procedure, and the registry agreement that binds the operator after delegation. ### Where the 2026 round stands As of October 2026, the application window of the 2026 round is closed. It opened on 30 April 2026 and closed on 12 August 2026. ICANN reported 1,663 applications submitted, of which 1,616 were paid and are proceeding. On Reveal Day, 7 October 2026, ICANN published the applied-for strings and the applicants. A string replacement period followed, from 8 to 21 October, in which applicants could switch to a backup string. The base evaluation fee was USD 227,000 per application. ICANN lists the next milestones as String Confirmation Day and a Community Input and Objections Period. The dates and details are published by ICANN, which is the only reliable source. Because the periods for objections and comments are limited, a brand owner who wants to react should check them now. ### How an application proceeds After the application window, applications go through string and applicant evaluation. Third parties may comment and object. Based on the 2012 model, which the 2026 guidebook largely follows, the grounds for objection are: - string confusion: the string is confusingly similar to another string; - legal rights: the string infringes the objector's existing rights, typically a trademark; - limited public interest: the string is contrary to generally accepted legal norms; and - community: substantial opposition from a community the string explicitly or implicitly targets. Independent dispute resolution providers decide objections. Governments can also give advice through ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee. If several applicants want the same string, they form a contention set, which is resolved by agreement or, failing that, by auction. Once an application passes, the operator signs the registry agreement and the string is delegated in the root zone. ## In practice ### An applicant A European manufacturer applied for its own name as a brand TLD. At Reveal Day it sees that a competitor in another country applied for a string that looks similar. The manufacturer can assess whether to file a string confusion objection or a legal rights objection, or to negotiate with the competitor. Its earlier trademark searches and its evidence of use support either path. ### A brand owner who did not apply A Dutch consumer brand did not apply. At Reveal Day it finds that a third party has applied for a string identical to its best-known trademark. As the trademark holder, it can file a legal rights objection or comment in the community input period. It will have to show its rights, the similarity of the string to its mark and why the applicant's use would take unfair advantage or harm its mark. If the string is delegated as an open registry, rights protection mechanisms such as the Trademark Clearinghouse, sunrise registrations and the Uniform Rapid Suspension system, described in the article on [domain name disputes](https://www.pitch.law/academy/udrp-and-domain-name-disputes), protect trademark owners at the second level. ### Lookalikes around new extensions Each delegated gTLD becomes a new place for lookalike domain names. [Our online brand monitoring](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/domain-monitoring-enforcement) discovers newly registered names, and [our clearance engine](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/efficient-cost-effective-and-accurate-trademark-clearance-solutions) checks strings against trademark registers. ## Frequently asked questions ### Can I still apply in the 2026 round? No. The application window closed on 12 August 2026. The previous large round was in 2012, so the rounds have been many years apart, and a decision to wait for a further round is a long-term one. ### I did not apply. Is there anything for me to do? Check the list of applied-for strings for names that match or resemble your trademarks. If you find one, you can comment or object within the periods ICANN publishes, and you can plan your rights protection for the time the string opens. ### What does it cost to apply? The base evaluation fee in the 2026 round was USD 227,000 per application. Other fees and the costs of a registry service provider, advice and objections come on top. ### How long until a new gTLD is live? It depends on contention and objections. Applications without either move faster, but delegation is not immediate after the window closes. The timeline is set by ICANN. ## How this connects Pitch advises brand owners on every stage described here in [New gTLDs for Brands](https://www.pitch.law/solutions/new-gtlds). The use of the technology is concrete: [clearance of strings](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/efficient-cost-effective-and-accurate-trademark-clearance-solutions) and [monitoring of lookalike domains](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/domain-monitoring-enforcement). Related articles explain the [Applicant Guidebook for brand TLDs](https://www.pitch.law/academy/brand-tlds-in-the-2026-round-of-new-gtlds-key-takeaways-from-the-draft-applicant-guidebook) and the [history of the programme](https://www.pitch.law/academy/history-and-background). ## In short - Status of the 2026 round as of October 2026 - What happens after Reveal Day - Objections and contention explained - What brand owners who did not apply can still do ## Related solutions - [Solutions](https://www.pitch.law/solutions/new-gtlds) ### [New gTLDs for Brands](https://www.pitch.law/solutions/new-gtlds) [Advice for brand owners on ICANN's new gTLD programme, from the decision to apply through objections and contention to running a registry.](https://www.pitch.law/solutions/new-gtlds) ## Technology we use - [Technology](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/efficient-cost-effective-and-accurate-trademark-clearance-solutions) ### [Trademark Clearance Search](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/efficient-cost-effective-and-accurate-trademark-clearance-solutions) [Our clearance engine runs a name through absolute grounds, registers and online sources, scores similarity and produces an opinion that an attorney signs off.](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/efficient-cost-effective-and-accurate-trademark-clearance-solutions) - [Technology](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/domain-monitoring-enforcement) ### [Online Brand Monitoring](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/domain-monitoring-enforcement) [Continuous discovery of lookalike domain names, counterfeit listings and impersonating accounts, with detections shown in the client portal for attorney review.](https://www.pitch.law/technologies/domain-monitoring-enforcement) ## More in New gTLDs - ### [Brand TLDs in the 2026 Round: the Applicant Guidebook](https://www.pitch.law/academy/brand-tlds-in-the-2026-round-of-new-gtlds-key-takeaways-from-the-draft-applicant-guidebook) [What a brand TLD is, how the Applicant Guidebook treats it, and the contract obligations that come with running one.](https://www.pitch.law/academy/brand-tlds-in-the-2026-round-of-new-gtlds-key-takeaways-from-the-draft-applicant-guidebook) - ### [Brand TLDs in Financial Services](https://www.pitch.law/academy/dotbrand-domains-in-financial-services-what-a-decade-of-data-reveals-about-trust-security-and-the-road-to-2026) [Why banks and insurers look at brand TLDs, what a brand TLD can and cannot do against phishing, and which EU rules shape the decision.](https://www.pitch.law/academy/dotbrand-domains-in-financial-services-what-a-decade-of-data-reveals-about-trust-security-and-the-road-to-2026) - ### [History of ICANN's New gTLD Program](https://www.pitch.law/academy/history-and-background) [How the top-level domain space grew from a handful of extensions to more than a thousand, and what the earlier rounds teach applicants and brand owners today.](https://www.pitch.law/academy/history-and-background) - ### [Strategic Use Cases for Brand TLDs](https://www.pitch.law/academy/strategic-use-cases-for-brand-tlds-from-experiment-to-a-cornerstone-in-digital-strategy) [How companies use a brand TLD in practice, from authentication and anti-phishing to internal systems and partner networks, and the legal points that go with each use.](https://www.pitch.law/academy/strategic-use-cases-for-brand-tlds-from-experiment-to-a-cornerstone-in-digital-strategy) ## Let’s talk Tell us what you’re working on. We’ll get the right person on it and reply within one business day. The first chat is free. [Schedule a meeting](https://www.pitch.law/schedule)